Search for: "People v. Farley"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Farley: they do reject all SHIT marks.Rettew: Madonna for wines was once considered scandalous. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Lee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
” Farley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Apple Computer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
Gulp v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Case citation: Farley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
These particular people could have outsized influence. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Eldon’s doctrine pulls the rug out from under that tactic—which people trying to suppress libel they’d disavowed actually did. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am
Written statements from a number of other people were relied on by both sides. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
That’s what Golan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Sheff: question is ex ante costs of rigor v. ex post costs of resolving conflicts; reasonable people disagree. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
A public Facebook page is able to be viewed worldwide by whoever clicks on that page and the grapevine effect stemming from the use of this type of medium must be considered: Mickle v Farley [2013] NSWDC 295. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Renna v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
Farley: what is the worst case scenario? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
For his project, compare Christine Haight Farley on the inter-American treaties where American companies were apparently doing the same thing.) [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
