Search for: "People v. Felix" Results 1 - 20 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2008, 3:50 pm
For example, I could explain why I think that the majority view in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am by ernst
As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in Brown v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
" Now, Section 543 doesn't say anything about giving those people special rules or privileges, and instead is just an authorization to allow them to become AUSAs. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:27 am
  Here's Justice O'Connor (Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:38 am by Richard Primus
Just noticing:Chief Justice Roberts, in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Part I tells the story of Colegrove v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Nor does the fact that the defendant has a grand total of $189 in cash in his entire house lead me to believe that he's the Arellano Felix of marijuana up there in Modoc County.Fifteen dollars worth of pot from a disabled Vietnam veteran. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
Héctor García, Carlos Cadena, César Chávez, Felix Tijerina, Gus García, James DeAnda, Cris Aldrete, Felix Z. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 12:14 pm by Derek T. Muller
” So wrote Justice Felix Frankfurter in his dissenting opinion in Baker v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:34 pm by Bartolus
France may require a reorganization of that department in order to separate the investigative and adjudicative roles currently exercised by the same people. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by Derek Muller
” So wrote Justice Felix Frankfurter in his dissenting opinion in Baker v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:19 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter in a concurring opinion of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, writing for the court, observed that the new 1916 law “was obviously directed towards the consequences of the decision in Guinn v. [read post]