Search for: "People v. Fernandez"
Results 41 - 60
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 1:04 pm
California (2014) Fernandez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 6:54 am
People v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Then Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:38 am
Fernandez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Fernandez explains: In Georgia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Elisabeth Fontugne, Respecting Religion: How Court and Congress Impermissibly Treaded on Sacred Ground to the People's Detriment, (December 15, 2015).Jared A. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:21 pm
Even a class limited to those who never used the program (despite paying for it), Judge Fernandez argued, might well still fail the typicality requirement, since some people might well have deliberately enrolled in the thing but simply never got around to using it. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:05 am
Perez v Fernandez: Australia's First Decision on the Moral Right of Integrity" (2013) 23 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 174UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013-32JANI MCCUTCHEON, University of Western Australia - Faculty of LawEmail: jani.mccutcheon@uwa.edu.auThis article examines the recent Federal Magistrates Court decision of Perez v Fernandez, Australia’s first case on the moral right of integrity. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:09 pm
Petrone v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:59 am
So many people watching. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:25 am
People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Fernandez. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 5:07 am
Fernandez and People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 5:07 am
Fernandez and People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
Or, more specifically, how we tax (or don't tax) people who eschew private property and live in a religious commune in which all income and expenses are owned and distributed collectively.I admit that I didn't know much about Hutterite communities before I read the opinion. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:26 am
Fernandez NASSAU COUNTYTorts Theory of Inherent Compulsion to Overcome Doctrine of Assumption of Risk Doctrine Inapplicable Monti v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKLabor LawFact Issues Bar Judgment for Contractor in Worker's Action Alleging Breaches of State's 'Scaffold Law' Fernandez v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:29 am
The style of the case is, Employers Mutual Casualty Company; Emcasco Insurance Company v. [read post]
