Search for: "People v. Fields"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
Jacobs Research Prize in the field of youth development. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:51 am
The post Competitive Keyword Ads Go to Court: Edible Arrangements v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
Apparently people have questioned her birth gender in the past. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
We just got back from visiting the Supreme Court, where we hung out with the (sizable and growing) crowd of people camped out at One First Street, so they can get seats in the courtroom for tomorrow's argument in the D.C. gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:48 pm
Photo Album: District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:22 am
The field of non-repudiation services is getting more and more crowded every week. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am
In my own view, the matter is unusual as both parties, in certain aspects, are carrying the same ideology: to try and gain a level playing field for all. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
By Eric Goldman Parker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 1:18 pm
Lang v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm
In Broussard v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm
To conclude that officers in the field must follow a plan which is set in place by the higher echelons, and then to conclude that the officers in the field may cavalierly disregard certain key elements of that plan, whether intentionally or unintentionally, would be to countenance the "standardless and unconstrained discretion" and "evil" the Supreme Court spoke about in the case of Delaware v Prouse,, 440 US 648, 661 [1979]. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:58 am
It’s a hugely growing field. [read post]
