Search for: "People v. Fields (1983)" Results 41 - 60 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm by John Ross
" Do the facility's employees (and the facility itself) count as state actors under Section 1983? [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 2:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Supreme Court 2020) The question in this case is whether the Federal Reserve Banks are people. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
The section 1983 suit asserted several due process and equal protection claims, including the one discussed here. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  In some sense, this was also the great year of Jew baiting--everyone, it seems, had something to say about the People of Israel, even as their actions usually belied their words. [read post]