Search for: "People v. Fischer"
Results 201 - 220
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm
Fischer, one of the nation’s harshest injury threshold laws. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am
The Sedlik v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
Fischer. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 4:42 am
Fischer, continuing medical treatment is critical. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 7:52 am
Most recently, in Haynes v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd, a gender… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:07 am
The increase can be seen as a consequence of the decision in eBay v. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
(The Supreme Court has another case pending this term, Fischer v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Fischer and Eric N. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Arbor alleged that the City had, without a vote of the people, effectively levied hidden taxes on its citizens through the excessive ch [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:49 am
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:29 am
Fischer. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s decision this week to review Husted v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
In approving the deal following a fairness hearing Monday, Judge Dale Fischer of the Central District of California rejected objectors' claims that the deal amounted to a "coupon" recovery contrary to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. [read post]
