Search for: "People v. Fischer" Results 121 - 140 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Sandy
 The New York State Court of Appeals ruled on the issue in People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 4:35 am by SHG
The outcome of Fischer v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 10:51 am by Orlando Personal Injury Attorney
Three people, including the deceased, were traveling southbound on U.S. 1 in a silver Honda CR-V when they attempted to make a left hand turn onto Fischer Street. ...Read more [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Fischer has used his radio show to promote outrageous, denigrating claims about LGBT people, Muslims, Native Americans and African Americans.In the interview, Parker not only discussed a marriage equality case pending before the Alabama Supreme Court – Ex parte State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Dissenting, Judge Fischer argued that the decision by “this trial court to exclude what amounted to days and days of such evidence” because the employee failed to exhaust his pattern and practice claim was not an abuse of discretion (Cox v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]