Search for: "People v. Fischer" Results 141 - 160 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that among the cases the court added to its docket for next term is Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times the court announced that “it would not hear a closely watched case on whether cities can make it a crime for homeless people to sleep outdoors,” City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that, as explained in a recent filing in Swartz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
Maricopa County Community College Dist., 2004 WL 2008954 (D.Ariz. 2004); Fischer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:12 am by Steven Gursten
So what happened after Kreiner v Fischer took these “third-party” auto accident tort cases away from the auto lawyers who used to handle a lot of $20,000 policy limit cases for a living? [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Consumers groups and organisations representing blind people were supportive of the bill. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:26 am by Russ Bensing
Goode, in which the defendant is charged with felonious assault of two people. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Joe Consumer
Fischer case that only "permanently" harmed people were entitled to this type of compensation, reversing law that had been in effect basically since the 1960s when Michigan's no-fault law passed. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Joe Consumer
Fischer case that only "permanently" harmed people were entitled to this type of compensation, reversing law that had been in effect basically since the 1960s when Michigan's no-fault law passed. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am by Amy Howe
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times) previews the oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:10 pm by Steven M. Gursten
Fischer, which prevented car accident lawyers from recovering damages for people injured by negligent drivers - even drunk drivers -  because of Michigan’s very high threshold law that car accident victims must meet. [read post]