Search for: "People v. Flood (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2014, 1:58 pm
In October 1998, he flooded his cell. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 3:45 am
It was a most disastrous event, the flood rising to 5 metres and resulting in twelve people losing their lives including young children. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:26 am
Dobson and others v Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2011] EWHC 3253 – read judgment David Hart QC acted for the defendants in this case. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
J. 1535 (1998). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Decreto n.2.519/1998. [read post]
7 May 2008, 8:20 pm
At the same time, in a case called Diamond v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:36 am
The high court agreed, citing 1998’s Ross v. [read post]
Sunlight is the best disinfectant: open justice and company law proceedings in Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm
As to the first, no privilege arose on the facts; and, even if one did, the interests of justice required that it be precluded (Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v AAB Export Finance Ltd [1990] 1 IR 469 (SC); Murphy v Kirwan [1993] 3 IR 501 (SC); Miley v Flood [2001] 1 ILRM 489, [2001] 2 IR 50, [2001] IEHC 9 (24 January 2001); Fyffes v DCC [2005] 1 IR 59 (SC), [2005] IESC 3 (27 January 2005) applied). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Monk v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
But the first case in which a national newspaper won at trial on the basis of a Reynolds/Jameel defence was Flood v Times Newspapers Limited [2010] EMLR 8 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:57 am
Metzger, 152 N.J. 490 (1998) (single use of the phrase "jungle bunny" severe for purposes of establishing liability for racial harassment); Kwiatkowski v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
Since 1998, however, the rules of the House governing staff depositions have evolved to give committees access to the tool more regularly. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
This edition is edited by Paul Daly and Colleen Flood, both professors of law. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
Satchell, 489 P.2d 1361, 1370 (Cal. 1971) overruled on other grounds by People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
("A Cobbler's Court, a Practitioner's Court: The Rehnquist Court Finds Its Groove," 1998 Tulsa L. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
In 1998, the Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases, Faragher v. [read post]
