Search for: "People v. Flowers"
Results 301 - 320
of 347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Greenhouse owner wants a robot to tend flowers to save space; shows the manufacturer how to make it. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm
Neither is Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:39 pm
Hall v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:11 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
“That we'd end up like India and Egypt where people don't invent things. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:54 am
(Say, advocating for a public option in health care - somethat that all the polls indicate most people favor.) [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
Flowers from the garden? [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:25 pm
From United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm
The court found that most people reading those words would conclude that they had replacement value insurance, It held, citing the Supreme Court of Canada's decisions in Fine's Flowers Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
OH WAIT….MY MISTAKE….READ ON] From chocolate to cereal, football to flowers--and they all have logos. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:59 am
(This doesn't seem to go to sponsorship of communications v. sponsorship of products and services.) [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
Not enough basis, though; Flowers’ conviction was affirmed. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
In addition he himself trampled the flower bed in response to her intervention. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:05 pm
On this point, the Chancellor, relied on the principles in a 1901 English Court of Appeal ruling in Duke of Bedford v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:14 am
In People v Flowers (2009 NY Slip Op 01044 [4th Dept 2/11/09]) , the defendant was arrested for Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree (subdivision 12) while the police were executing a search warrant upon his home. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
" People v. [read post]
