Search for: "People v. Flowers"
Results 41 - 60
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 8:32 am
The case of Joshua Martin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
" People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Justice Kavanaugh announces opinion in Flowers v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
How many people do you think would know the difference? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
The case of Flowers v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Black people are resilient — we’ve created so much already. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:36 am
I refer to a classic contract law case, Odorizzi v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
Buy yourself some flowers - you deserve them! [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:25 pm
From United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Robert then tackled Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, in which the CJEU viewed the impression of the average internet user as being an essential element of the test of whether the use of another's brand as a keyword conveys an impression that the use of that brand suggests that the user's business is connected with that of the brand owner. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:46 am
” At Law.com, David Ogden weighs in on Flowers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
It's dark and not many people are out and about yet. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:39 am
Chicago (1949), Cohen v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
,infamous whites or younger people). [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am
The obvious difference lies in the text: whilst Chanel has ‘N°5, CHANEL’, the alleged infringing product uses ‘N°9, FLOWER OF STORY’ (hereinafter ‘the N°9 perfume’). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Flowers, 909 F.2d 145, 146 (6th Cir.1990). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm
The court found that most people reading those words would conclude that they had replacement value insurance, It held, citing the Supreme Court of Canada's decisions in Fine's Flowers Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
But in a second decision, Pliva v. [read post]
