Search for: "People v. Flowers"
Results 61 - 80
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 5:39 am
Chicago (1949), Cohen v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am
The obvious difference lies in the text: whilst Chanel has ‘N°5, CHANEL’, the alleged infringing product uses ‘N°9, FLOWER OF STORY’ (hereinafter ‘the N°9 perfume’). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
,infamous whites or younger people). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Flowers, 909 F.2d 145, 146 (6th Cir.1990). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm
The court found that most people reading those words would conclude that they had replacement value insurance, It held, citing the Supreme Court of Canada's decisions in Fine's Flowers Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
But in a second decision, Pliva v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
But the mood quickly turns serious as Flowers v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
In a 2012 decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
Not enough basis, though; Flowers’ conviction was affirmed. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Fox News has an op-ed from Barronelle Stutzman, the florist whose refusal on religious grounds to design flowers for a same-sex wedding is at the root of the cert petition in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm
Case citation: Edible Arrangements, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Briefly: At the Stanford Law Review, Thomas Ward Frampton urges a second look at Justice Clarence Thomas’ controversial dissent in Flowers v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
One is Ingersoll v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:25 am
" [FLOWERS v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:00 am
What’s lost is its original meaning to many people. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:05 pm
On this point, the Chancellor, relied on the principles in a 1901 English Court of Appeal ruling in Duke of Bedford v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
So can sandwiches, legal briefs, bicycles, cars, flowers, medical care. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:30 am
This issue hasn't been touched on by the EU courts in a while, and in the lead-up to a CJEU decision Advocate General Kokott has given their two cents in a recently published opinion discussing this very issue.The case of Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO concerned the application for the registration of a figurative mark by Nadal Esteban for the trademark "STYLO & KOTON", with the letters o written using symbols that look like flowers… [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:30 am
This issue hasn't been touched on by the EU courts in a while, and in the lead-up to a CJEU decision Advocate General Kokott has given their two cents in a recently published opinion discussing this very issue.The case of Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO concerned the application for the registration of a figurative mark by Nadal Esteban for the trademark "STYLO & KOTON", with the letters o written using symbols that look like flowers… [read post]
