Search for: "People v. Flowers"
Results 61 - 80
of 347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 9:30 am
The California Supreme Court held the following: “Because application of [due care] is inherently situational, the amount of care deemed reasonable in any particular case will vary, while at the same time the standard of conduct itself remains constant, i.e., due care commensurate with the risk posed by the conduct taking into consideration all relevant circumstances (Flowers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
Certainly proponents f a thousand legislative flowers blooming take comfort in the expectation that variaitons will be minor and eventually there will be convergence. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
They were popular domestic terrorists even though responsible for, more than 200 bombings and dozens of robberies between 1963 and 1970 that left six people dead, and the kidnapping of the British trade commissioner, and the kidnapping and murder of a Quebec government cabinet minister. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:01 am
Bullard and an unidentified person lay flowers at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Paris in 1954. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 10:56 am
Something similar, though with more risk of violence, arose in NAACP v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
Flowers, the Court clarified that people are eligible for relief under the First Step Act even if their Guidelines remain unchanged. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:20 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 11:29 am
Flowers, Michael J. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:02 pm
In Schreiber v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
Cannabis that's not in a receptacle is described in the statute as "loose flower cannabis. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
”) People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Flowers v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:00 pm
Greensburg Community School Corp.In Hayden v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
