Search for: "People v. Flowers" Results 81 - 100 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 2201 (2000), and erred in its determination that Norman Flowers ("Flowers"), a therapist at the Morton Center, was not covered by the Morton Center's liability insurance policy with Scottsdale for tort damages arising from Flowers' sexual affair with Burke. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times the court announced that “it would not hear a closely watched case on whether cities can make it a crime for homeless people to sleep outdoors,” City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 That was the question posed by a case from the Oakland County Circuit Court that went to the Michigan Court of Appeals.Now, on last week's remand back to the Oakland County trial court, an evidentiary hearing will be conducted in the People v Carruthers case to determine whether the accused was using a "reasonable" amount of marijuana by baking the pot brownies.Earl Carruthers was charged with illegally manufacturing marijuana when pot brownies and several ounces of "loose"… [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am by Matrix Law
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 2/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Judge Kozinski ate a sandwich paid for by the ACLU and the National Law Journal and American Bar Association are totally on it; Update: “Ohio court says city can’t use ‘quick-take’ to seize property” [Watchdog, earlier on town of Perrysburg’s effort to seize property in adjoining Middleton Township] Regarding the wildly one-sided attacks on arbitration of late, I’ve noticed that the people who call contractually agreed-to arbitration… [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Robin Maher writes that although “[t]he decision [in Flowers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:43 am by Michael Morgenstern
The YMCA presented testimony that the purpose of the fence was not to prevent falls but to prevent people from walking on the flowers surrounding the monument stone. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am by SHG
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]