Search for: "People v. Fordyce"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am
Over the next three years Fordyce forced A.M. to send pornographic images and videos of herself to him, perform for Fordyce and his friends, and recruit other minors for Fordyce to abuse. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:51 am
City of Cumming, 212 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 2000); Fordyce v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
" Fordyce v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
City of Cumming, 212 F.3d 1332, 1333 (11th Cir. 2000) (recognizing a First Amendment right to photograph or videotape police conduct); Fordyce v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
” Fordyce v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:29 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- in which California is located -- acknowledged a First Amendment right to film matters of public interest, including the activities of police officers, over seventeen years earlier in Fordyce v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Fordyce v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
