Search for: "People v. Franklin" Results 1 - 20 of 659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
People who owned such weapons before the effective date of the law are permitted to retain them, subject to some geographic restrictions on use; otherwise, possession is a crime. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 The holdings of the principal cases Trump cites for the "clear statement" rule, especially Franklin v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
I can see Justice Kavanaugh writing a concurrence explaining that the clear statement rule should apply across the board, relying on Franklin v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Samuel Alito asks about President Franklin D. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The basic bargain that President Franklin Roosevelt and Congress laid out 90 years ago was that investors get to decide which risks to take so long as those companies raising money from the public make what Roosevelt called, “complete and truthful disclosure. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
We gather at this historic place and time to show solidarity, and to honor the resilience and unbroken spirit of the people of Ukraine through ideas and action. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
In January 1941, Franklin Roosevelt came to this chamber to speak to the nation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(In contrast, we have long backed an amendment to overturn Buckley v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]