Search for: "People v. Friday"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
Wilkinson v London Strategic Health Authority is an interesting decision on the entitlement to copyright in training materials which has been sitting for too long in the IPKat's in-tray -- but you can read about it now thanks to Mark Anderson's to-the-point dissection of the issues on IP Draughts. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
Wednesday's oral argument in Alvarez v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 5:47 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
McDermott, which the Justices will take up in Conference on Friday. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 am
The Ninth Circuit held Friday in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 10:26 am
Happy Friday! [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
The justices announced late Friday that they will hear oral argument on Nov. 30 in Trump v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:12 am
” Following Wednesday’s oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:05 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 5:34 am
Fast Company: “The world changed for many people on Friday, June 24 when the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 3:01 am
They are:Case T-278/04 Jabones Pardo v OHIM - Quimi Romar (YUKI). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:30 am
” As an example, he pointed to U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Evans, Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
In Maples v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 8:22 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court will consider cases to hear in the coming term, among them National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:51 am
One such petition, as Nabiha noted yesterday, is Kiyemba v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Last Friday a divided Appellate Division, Fourth Department ruled that an extended investigation resulting from a tinted-windows stop was illegal, and suppressed drugs, dismissed drug possession, assault 2, resisting arrest and OGA convictions as a result (People v Edwards, 2009 WL 2635784 [4th Dept 8/28/09]). [read post]
