Search for: "People v. Friday" Results 261 - 280 of 2,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 5:21 am by Rachel Sachs
At PatentDocs (here and here), Kevin Noonan continues to review the various amicus briefs filed in Bowman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Next say that the remaining T-shirts will be donated to Oxfam for their charity work abroad.As time goes on, there seem to be an increasing number of cases involving big retail chains and their apparent abuse of third party IPR, as people are becoming more aware of the rights they hold in their creations. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
On the jiplp weblog there's an analysis of the Court of Justice of the European Union's latest "clarification" of European law on the registration of product shapes as trade marks in Hauck v Stokke, the "Tripp Trapp" chair case. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
 Says Merpel, while lighter sentences may be appropriate for people who have a previously clean criminal record, it is possible that the courts may wish to impose a heavier fine in the hope that it will have a detergent deterrent effect on others.The sight of one hand being registered .. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:38 am
Not only were they duping the public and letting people believe that they were part of the Nestlé Brand but they also promised customers a chance to win a prize which was not actually on offer. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
Justice Kagan has been named to TIME’s 2013 list of its one hundred most influential people in the world. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am by Nabiha Syed
On Wednesday the government filed a supplemental brief in Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:24 am by Russ Bensing
  The Supreme Court finished oral argument for the term this week, but the big news was the Court’s acceptance of certiorari in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
  Then there was State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:10 am
 The Kat can't say that CLT's IP and Finance one-day conference scheduled for 20 October will dispel the fog the surrounds the topic, but it may be a good place for people in need of some reasonable guidance to start. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:30 am
The IPKat recalls a Finnish Supreme Court majority decision, Teosto v A Taxi Driver [2004] ECDR 3, in which the playing of music by a taxi driver in the course of taking a customer to his destination constituted a performance in public, even though the passenger generally had no say in the choice of music - or whether the taxi driver might be kind enough to turn it off: might the same approach be adopted here, he wonders? [read post]