Search for: "People v. Friday" Results 421 - 440 of 2,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Len Necefer, Founder of Natives Outdoors, will present the Midday Address on Friday. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:19 pm by Silver Law Group
You can read the petition for Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
The court also held that DACA failed the first step in Chevron USA v Natural Res. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
From Friday July 17 through Friday July 23 I participated in the second virtual American Association of Law Libraries annual conference. [read post]
This requirement does not satisfy the threefold test of legality, necessity, and proportionality established by the Supreme Court in KS Puttaswamy v Union of India. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:38 pm by Amy Howe
The order cited the court’s 2020 ruling in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 6:49 am by INFORRM
The plaintiff, 62-year-old Michael Reilly, of Ballycullen, Mullinahone, Thurles, in County Tipperary, sued Iconic Newspaper Ltd over a report which appeared on the “Court briefly” section in the Kilkenny People on Friday February 19, 2016. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am by Mark Summerfield
As I recently (tentatively) predicted, on Friday 30 July 2021 Justice Beach in the Federal Court of Australia handed down a judgment giving Australia the dubious honour of becoming the first country in the world to legally recognise a non-human as a valid inventor on a patent application: Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am by Mark Summerfield
As I recently (tentatively) predicted, on Friday 30 July 2021 Justice Beach in the Federal Court of Australia handed down a judgment giving Australia the dubious honour of becoming the first country in the world to legally recognise a non-human as a valid inventor on a patent application: Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am by Kristian Soltes
The tribunal wrote on Friday that its decision to refuse the appeal was based on a European Court of Justice ruling that a counterfactual cannot be based on an unrealistic assumption. . . . [read post]