Search for: "People v. Frye"
Results 41 - 60
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
See also Wright v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
See also Wright v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
Citing Chief Judge Kaye's concurrence in People v Wesley, the dissent faults the experts' opinions for lacking a proper foundation. [read post]
9 May 2015, 5:57 pm
If your client has had many youthful indiscretions, pay attention to whether the prosecution will try to highlight his many children with many mothers, and try to limit that citing People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
Baity, the Washington Supreme Court found the basis for HGN testing, that intoxicated people will exhibit nystagmus, to be generally accepted under Frye. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Frye (Univ. of Kentucky College of Law) William T. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said the People oppose the defendant's motion. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
This post discussed Sawaf v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
The Court, interpreting People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 11:43 pm
Frye, has become “a system of pleas, not a system of trials. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 6:38 am
Frye, 132 S. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 6:40 am
Frye, 132 S. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
(People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 8:59 am
Wells v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
