Search for: "People v. Frye"
Results 81 - 100
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and Frye v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:03 am
An Evidentiary Ruling, Even When Made in Advance of a Trial on Motion Papers, Is Not Appealable In Matter of Lyons v Lyons, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 2714210 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
Attorneys for 600 Land, Inc: Robert Frye, Indianapolis, IN; Scott Sikkenga, Kalamazoo, MI. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
That is the general rule, I believe, but the odd facts of Frye v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Frye (5-4): Court holds that right to counsel extends to “effective plea bargaining. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
Bonnie Goldstein of the Washington Post’s She The People blog looks at Tuesday’s arguments in Miller v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:49 am
The “common-sense purpose” of the Kelly rule requires that it be applied whenever a party is trying to introduce scientific techniques that, though “new, novel, or experimental, convey a misleading aura of certainty.” People v Stoll (1989) 49 C3d 1136, 1156. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:25 am
” Texas v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
Board of Freeholders, No. 10-945, asks whether people arrested and held for minor offenses may be routinely strip-searched.The court will also consider, in Maples v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
One was a Florida Supreme Court ruling in Charles v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:23 am
That hit a brick wall in a major new decision in Muhummad v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:38 am
Subscription Required
KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeComplainant's Prior Grand Jury Testimony Found to Constitute Prior Inconsistent Statement
People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Frye (Univ. of Kentucky College of Law) William T. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am
The Daubert Court rejected the earlier test that was used for this purposes, which came from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals’ decision in Frye v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Frye (Winston Salem, NC)Capitol v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
9 May 2015, 5:57 pm
If your client has had many youthful indiscretions, pay attention to whether the prosecution will try to highlight his many children with many mothers, and try to limit that citing People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
After a brief discussion of the long-recognized rule of Frye v United States — in that expert testimony must be based on scientific principles or procedures and is admissible only after a principle or procedure has gained general acceptance in its specified field — the court swiftly deconstructed Dr. [read post]
