Search for: "People v. Frye (1998)"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Frye (1998) 18 Cal.App.4th 894 and People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Frye (1998) 18 Cal.4th 894. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
Baity, the Washington Supreme Court found the basis for HGN testing, that intoxicated people will exhibit nystagmus, to be generally accepted under Frye. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:16 am
Frye and Hafler v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
Brian Frye has an interesting post up over at Concurring Opinions on Friedman v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
It wasn’t until AT&T v. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), and to no longer apply the standard in Frye v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:30 am
” People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Frye v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Jackson, 269 Ga. 308(1) (496 SE2d 912) (1998); Ambles v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
In or around 1998, one of us collaborated with Justice Frank Iacobucci of the Supreme Court of Canada to present materials on rights for gay people for a conference of judges from all around the world. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Even some so-called Frye jurisdictions “get it. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
