Search for: "People v. Gaffney"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2020, 8:27 am
This is one of those (rare) case, all the more remarkable because the inmate won his appeal pro se against the Connecticut Attorney General's office.The case is Gaffney v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm
" Gaffney, 412 U.S. at 743-744. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
[People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535] The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2012/2012_00217.htm [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
American courts have stripped Black lives of value going back to Dred Scott and Plessy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:45 am
Its decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
"* The rule of three was held lawful by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores can allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligibles. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
” The Court of Appeals, however, ruled that such a requirement, in effect, made the Civil Service Commission the appointing authority [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32 (1900)]. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:09 am
The case is Lewis v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 2:00 pm
Same-sex marriage supporter Stuart Gaffney hugs a friend while celebrating the U.S Supreme Court ruli [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Intellectual Property Watch is a much-valued service to the IP community worldwide -- but it's not sufficiently valued for people to give it adequate funding. [read post]