Search for: "People v. Galvan" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
Many of the people targeted were American citizens or legal residents. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:30 am by Clint Bolick
  The threat of judicial action, such as the specter of overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:51 pm by Moshe (Thomas A.) Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.
One side of this soul is the Godly intellect giving rise to the human identity or self-awareness and the other side is the animal soul whose purpose is to galvanize the body. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Tony Mauro
The protests marked the two-year anniversary Saturday of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm by Eva Arevuo
” So, Move to Amend is also looking to overturn the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
Holder “might galvanize a Supreme Court majority to say ‘Enough! [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Coburn believes Congress should apologize to the American people for failing to provide adequate oversight over our disability programs. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am by Betsy McKenzie
We, the People, can take back the power we gave to Congress. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
Article V of Georgia’s Uniform Rules of the Road addresses the right and duties of pedestrians. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
Article V of Georgia’s Uniform Rules of the Road addresses the right and duties of pedestrians. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:45 am by Mandelman
  It’s become a badge of honor for some people. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Humanitarian Law Project the Court split on ideological lines (except for Stevens joining the conservatives) to uphold the application of the "material aid" law to people who wanted to assist the non-violent wings of listed terrorist organizations by training them in peaceful conflict resolution. 2) In Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Erin Miller
  His galvanizing role in these cases, reaching back to his experience as a law clerk in the 1947 Term, has been well-chronicled. [read post]