Search for: "People v. Gamble (1994)"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 4:00 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:01 am
The taxpayer rested the argument on the premise that because section 165(d) does not apply to trades or businesses generally, it ought not apply to the gambling losses of gamblers who are in a trade or business and should be limited to the gambling losses of people who gamble without being in a trade or business. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
In Rahman Lord Bingham and Lord Roger agreed with the decision in Gamble and held that D2 was not liable: it was as if two new people had jumped out of the bushes and murdered the victim. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Megibow, 612 N.Y.S.2d 758 (1994); Aflalo v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Until recently, both groups received the casino subsidies under a 1994 deal former Mayor Robert Pastrick brokered to bring riverboat gambling to the lakefront city. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
Megibow, 612 N.Y.S.2d 758 (1994); Aflalo v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
By ignoring the indefeasibility of first registration land transactions have become a gamble. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:35 am
S. 26, 40 (1994) (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment). [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
” People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Rikos v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Telephone and Telegraph Companies The first came in the early 1900s, where some government officials demanded that telephone and telegraph companies block access to their services by people suspected of running illegal gambling operations. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 9:49 pm
Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444, 1450 (4th Cir. 1994). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cal., Filed 2005): Freedom Wave has sued Mad Catz et al. for infringement of its six patents claiming various technologies for wireless game controllers with vibration.Home Gambling Network et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
The caveat makes sense, but it clearly was never intended to be some sort of bright-line rule for people too lazy to look at the actual studies and data. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
