Search for: "People v. Garcia (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
A year later, in 1981, he committed second degree burglary and was sentenced to prison for 16 months. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am by PaulKostro
Thomas, 660 F.2d 680, 686 (5th Cir. 1981); Puricelli v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:05 am by David DePaolo
Nothing in real life actually prepares normal people for the implausibility of comp.A dentist in Nebraska and her insurance carrier found that out.Barbara Potter began her work as a dental hygienist for Patrick McCulla, DDS, around 1981. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Garcia, 905 F.2d 557, 559 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986, 111 S.Ct. 522, 112 L.Ed.2d 533 (1990); United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am by Christine Corcos
In 1981, Judge Vanessa Ruiz of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals successfully argued Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Eastern District of California Garcia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Eastern District of California Garcia v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am by Arkady Bukh
Von Braun’s crown jewel was his developing the Saturn V rocket that carried men to the moon. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
June 13) (suggesting that mentioning a felony coupled with "the omission to mention the reversal of the conviction" could be libelous); see also Garcia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
The absence of covenants explains the parties’ focus on good will and Justice Borrok’s reliance on the Court of Appeals’ 1981 opinion in Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Kessler holding, on the one hand, that the seller of a company including its good will has an implied duty not to engage in solicitation impairing the company’s good will and, on the other hand, the seller has no general non-compete duty absent express agreement. [read post]