Search for: "People v. Gardner" Results 181 - 200 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm by Charon QC
And let’s go for a hat trick of good reads (not that the blog posts which I refer to below are not good reads… they are… but Carl Gardner, on his Head of Legal blog, writes: Supreme Court judgment: Sugar v BBC “The Supreme Court has today given judgment in this case, about the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to information the BBC holds for journalistic purposes…. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
What gains are made by adopting language still used to persecute vulnerable people globally? [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Bissell
One Kurdish activist in Kobani was quoted as saying, “people underestimate the power of determination. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
Amy Gardner, Josh Dawsey and Paul Kane report for the Washington Post. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Where the later starts from the premise that all sovereign power is vested in a government whose authority is ordered and constrained by a constitutional document, Chinese constitutional theory starts from the premise of the delegation of sovereign authority from the people to its leading forces constituted as a vanguard party. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
23 May 2021, 3:24 pm by Giles Peaker
Following the Upper Tribunal decision in Goldsbrough and Swart v CA Property Management Ltd and Gardner (2019) UKUT 311(LC), the respondent was in control of an unlicensed property. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
@legalbizzle on his blog writes:The Angry Pencil: a pathology of customer complaints “There are people who can’t let a bandwagon go unjumped on. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]