Search for: "People v. Gardner" Results 161 - 180 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am by Adam Wagner
The Government argues that the will of the people is against prisoners voting and that Parliament has also expressed its strong view, albeit in a non-binding vote. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:27 am by Charon QC
  Carl Gardner, author of The Head of Legal blog, has covered the case in detail. [read post]
1 Oct 2006, 12:19 pm by Philip Mann
(Oh, I know, you just apply the clear guidance of Phillips v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:27 am by Adam Wagner
Many, including legal blogger Carl Gardner, argue that the European court keeps moving the goalposts. [read post]
1 Oct 2006, 12:19 pm
(Oh, I know, you just apply the clear guidance of Phillips v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by Larry Ribstein
Max Gardner III, a lawyer in Shelby, N.C., who defends homeowners in foreclosure proceedings. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
The service confirmed it gave tents to five people last year when hostel accommodation could not be found. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/uh4sqGyvPW -> ALJ Lord Grants Motion For Summary Determination Of No Copyright Infringement In Certain TV Programs http://t.co/rfG4i1r2iS -> ECommerce vendor not entitled to DMCA hosting safe harbor Gardner v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It comes up in the context of the Mark Gardner Rule. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Wagner
In an excellent post on the Head of Legal blog, Carl Gardner suggests the following solution: allow any convicted prisoner to apply to the judge when sentenced to imprisonment to lift, in his or her case, the ban on voting in general elections to Westminster and the devolved national legislatures. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am by Charon QC
  Judging by the response and the downloads, people seem to enjoy them. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s retaliation claim also was remanded for the lower court to consider, in the first instance, her argument that she had direct evidence of retaliation (Gardner v. [read post]