Search for: "People v. Garner" Results 1 - 20 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am by Bill Amadeo
Cress” which lays out the elements that have to be proven (People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by Quimbee
The State of Texas passed a law making it a crime for two people of the same-sex to engage in intimate sexual activity. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Brad Pauley
  But we couldn’t help notice the amount of press that lately has been garnered by the Court’s orders denying review: The ABA Journal reports that the Court denied review in People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by Quimbee
The State of Texas passed a law making it a crime for two people of the same-sex to engage in intimate sexual activity. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
 On a plethora of levels.Justice Rylaarsdam, like Justice Garner before him, admits that even though he's saying that "the issue must be one which, in counsel’s professional opinion, is meritorious" in order to be raised, "[t]hat is not to say that the contention must necessarily achieve success. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:12 am
The Oregon Supreme Court case that limited mandatory measure 11 sentences and that garnered a lot of headlines and commentary in September, was:STATE OF OREGON v. [read post]