Search for: "People v. Garner" Results 1 - 20 of 736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2011, 6:47 am by Tony Mauro
"Since I don’t think my own work is worth writing home about, I’d feel presumptuous telling other people what they ought to do. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am by Bill Amadeo
Cress” which lays out the elements that have to be proven (People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 10:56 am
Read almost any case, for example, the recent Second Amendment case, DC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by Quimbee
The State of Texas passed a law making it a crime for two people of the same-sex to engage in intimate sexual activity. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by david
Dale Carpenter’s new book, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
 On a plethora of levels.Justice Rylaarsdam, like Justice Garner before him, admits that even though he's saying that "the issue must be one which, in counsel’s professional opinion, is meritorious" in order to be raised, "[t]hat is not to say that the contention must necessarily achieve success. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by Quimbee
The State of Texas passed a law making it a crime for two people of the same-sex to engage in intimate sexual activity. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:44 pm
Like a fair number of other people, I'm completely captivated by Bryan Garner's videotaped interviews with Supreme Court justices on effective brief-writing. [read post]