Search for: "People v. Garner"
Results 1 - 20
of 797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 6:47 am
"Since I don’t think my own work is worth writing home about, I’d feel presumptuous telling other people what they ought to do. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:06 pm
Kholi, No. 09-868 (2011); Duncan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am
Cress” which lays out the elements that have to be proven (People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:23 am
Haaland v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
But I can summarize the key practical lesson that I garnered from the thing in a single sentence:Don't commit a cold-blooded murder in broad daylight with witnesses if you have a very distinctive neck tattoo.Otherwise they'll pretty much almost certainly catch you and throw you in prison for life.As here. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 2:06 pm
The case, Liebeck v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 10:56 am
Read almost any case, for example, the recent Second Amendment case, DC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:35 pm
In First United Security Bank v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:20 am
Miller v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 6:54 pm
Facts of Cerrato v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
Next week’s oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
Dale Carpenter’s new book, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
On a plethora of levels.Justice Rylaarsdam, like Justice Garner before him, admits that even though he's saying that "the issue must be one which, in counsel’s professional opinion, is meritorious" in order to be raised, "[t]hat is not to say that the contention must necessarily achieve success. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:44 pm
Like a fair number of other people, I'm completely captivated by Bryan Garner's videotaped interviews with Supreme Court justices on effective brief-writing. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
In Valdez v. [read post]
