Search for: "People v. Garrett" Results 141 - 160 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2011, 11:10 am by xsimpledemo
Garrett case described in a prior blogs posts, the Court of Appeals analyzed all of the many safety related obligations contained in the Capital Construction contract with Kroger, and determined that as a result of those safety obligations, Capital Construction had a duty to all people working on the Project for their safety. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:10 am by xsimpledemo
Garrett case described in a prior blogs posts, the Court of Appeals analyzed all of the many safety related obligations contained in the Capital Construction contract with Kroger, and determined that as a result of those safety obligations, Capital Construction had a duty to all people working on the Project for their safety.  [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, featuring their discussion of the Mueller indictments, ACLU v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:35 am by Anthony Gaughan
It’s dangerous. . . . people around here are not pros at this sort of thing. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]