Search for: "People v. Gibson" Results 241 - 260 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
The defendant also wrote emails to various people – foster carers, the director of professional standards at the Anglican Diocese and Fostering NSW. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm by Florian Mueller
If I see a CCIA brief that any significant part of its membership openly disagrees with (such as in Oracle v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
   The Court ruled to reject the appeal, upholding the decisions of both the Outer and Inner House of the Court of Session that the blanket ban is not unlawful: Moohan, Gibson and Gillon Petitioners, [2013] CSOH 199 and [2014] CSIH 56. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
People are forced to devise increasingly bizarre ways to express their thoughts. [read post]