Search for: "People v. Gibson" Results 141 - 160 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  This role was exposed in last week’s judgment in R v Norman ([2016] EWCA Crim 1564) which was discussed on the Panopticon blog Roy Greenslade in the Guardian said that the “wrong people were prosecuted over journalists’ payments to police,” and that the police should have been investigating Rupert Murdoch’s publishing business instead of France. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Carani, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.: WD Wash, Milo & Gabby v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
The Secretariat of the Norwegian Pension Fund Global has just circulated the decision, taken in April 2016 by the Norwegian Ethics Council, to recommend exclusion of Duke Energy Corp. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
IPSC Breakout Session II: Trademarks, Advertising & Consumers Relying on Reputation Jim Gibson Reputation: what rational consumers would use to decide what products/services to buy. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am by David Debold
David Debold is Partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP in Washington, D.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
--> EDITORS:Jean-Philippe Robé is a French and New York qualified partner in the Paris office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and a specialist in International Business Law. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
He has been sued over a tweet falsely implying Ulster Unionist MP Tom Elliott had shot people. [read post]
22 May 2016, 2:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The first to be opposed was in April, in Canada (Attorney General) v E.F., where the motions judge still granted the application on May 5, 2016. [read post]