Search for: "People v. Giles" Results 61 - 80 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Thomas v Lambeth LBC, County Court at Central London, 16 March 2017 This is a s.204 appeal in the County Court of a vulnerability decision by Lambeth. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Giles Peaker
Barnet, again. by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm by Giles Peaker
However, that decision, as has been seen, depended heavily on the availability of DHPs for disabled people. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:59 am by Giles Peaker
For people without dependant children, 12 months proof of residency was required. g). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm by Giles Peaker
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
It is, as the High Court quite properly found, about people seeking to [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
City West Housing Trust v Massey [2016] EWCA Civ 704 When considering a suspended possession order, how should the judge exercise their discretion where the tenant’s evidence has been disbelieved, in whole or part? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm by Giles Peaker
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm by Giles Peaker
The implications are clearly of significance for other councils, and will potentially impact many disabled people faced with the bedroom tax. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 8:06 am by Giles Peaker
So it might be an idea for people to make sure MPs are aware that the RLA assertions are legally nonsense. [read post]