Search for: "People v. Golb" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2014, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The State Court of Appeals sustains some of these convictions, but it does something that courts have threatened to do for years: it strikes down the Aggravated Harassment law as unconstutitional.The case is People v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:58 pm
So holds New York’s highest court in upholding most of the impersonation and forgery convictions in the Raphael Golb/Dead Sea Scrolls case (People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
In People v Golb, ___NY3d __,2014 WL 1883943 (2014) the Court of Appeals held that (Penal Law § 240.30(1)(a), aggravated harassment in the Second Degree   was unconstitutional, under both Federal and State law because it was vague and overbroad. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
In People v Dietze (75 NY2d 47 [1989]), this Court struck down a similar harassment statute, former Penal Law § 240.25, which prohibited the use of abusive or obscene language with the intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
People v Golb, __ NY3d __, 2014 NY Slip Op 03426 [May 13, 2014], even if a child may be exposed to it. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I assume that the purpose to harm a person's reputation would qualify under the "purpose[] of harming" language; compare People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:02 am by SHG
  That would be the language the Court of Appeals held unconstitutional in People v. [read post]