Search for: "People v. Golb"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2021, 1:39 pm
From J.F. v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 4:45 am
Though this account of Roe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
I assume that the purpose to harm a person's reputation would qualify under the "purpose[] of harming" language; compare People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:53 pm
Golb (N.Y. 2014) and People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
From State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
In People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
People v Golb, __ NY3d __, 2014 NY Slip Op 03426 [May 13, 2014], even if a child may be exposed to it. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
In People v Golb, ___NY3d __,2014 WL 1883943 (2014) the Court of Appeals held that (Penal Law § 240.30(1)(a), aggravated harassment in the Second Degree was unconstitutional, under both Federal and State law because it was vague and overbroad. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:02 am
That would be the language the Court of Appeals held unconstitutional in People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
The State Court of Appeals sustains some of these convictions, but it does something that courts have threatened to do for years: it strikes down the Aggravated Harassment law as unconstutitional.The case is People v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am
FWIW, I have occasionally had people complain about my on [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:20 am
In People v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
In People v Dietze (75 NY2d 47 [1989]), this Court struck down a similar harassment statute, former Penal Law § 240.25, which prohibited the use of abusive or obscene language with the intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:58 pm
So holds New York’s highest court in upholding most of the impersonation and forgery convictions in the Raphael Golb/Dead Sea Scrolls case (People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:57 am
The argument came in People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:31 am
People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:11 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] People v. [read post]