Search for: "People v. Gomez" Results 121 - 140 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 4:53 pm by James Eckert
The judge cannot replace a deliberating juror without the defendant's express written consent, executed in open court (CPL 270.35[1]; People v Gomez, 308 AD2d 460 [2d Dept 2003]). [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Downtown News Online, March 26, 2010 Operators of the Downtown Standard hotel have pleaded guilty to violating federal environmental law following a Jan. 18 incident that caused a street closure and sickened several people in a subway station. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:03 pm by Brian Shiffrin
People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 592, cert denied 400 US 851). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:12 pm by Brian Shiffrin
People v Gomez, 65 NY2d 9, 10-12; People v Mooney, 62 AD3d 725; People v Robinson, 16 AD3d 768, 769-770, lv denied 4 NY3d 856). [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
(For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:19 am
Hamilton in Blanca Gomez and Joan Wagner-Barnett v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:26 am
App. 1983) (the trial court improperly admitted evidence of defendant's refusal to allow police to enter his apartment to show a consciousness of guilt); Gomez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
Ajamie says his firm has signed up four or five Stanford investors as clients and he has a list of people to call back. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
L'Oreal: plaintiff alleges hair dye was  mislabeled; claims emotional distress resulting from  no longer being able to live life as a blonde Gomez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
See Justice Alito’s introduction in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Gomez-Gomez, No. 05-41461 Sentence for illegally reentering the United States is affirmed by the court sitting en banc, where a prior sex offense committed using constructive, i.e. nonphysical, force qualified as a "forcible sex offense" for sentence-enhancement purposes. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
  To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]