Search for: "People v. Gonzales" Results 81 - 100 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2007, 11:23 am
This opening resembles the same 5-4 majority's opinion earlier this year in Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Gonzales (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 35, review granted Feb. 17, 2016, S231171 [whether entering bank to cash forged checks is shoplifting]; People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
Stone wrote in the wake of Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
The administration's policy could potentially offset some of the negative effects of the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 9:06 pm by Rebecca Bernhardt
By our calculation, that bill could be $60,000 a month for Travis County based on debtors ordered jailed by the City of Austin alone.I hope this litigation creates an opportunity to rethink how things have been done in the past and change business as usual in municipal and JP courts for the future.MORE: See coverage of the new lawsuit from BuzzFeed News and the Austin Statesman, as well as BuzzFeed's related coverage from El Paso. * Disclosure - This post was authored by Rebecca Bernhardt,… [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 10:54 am by Schachtman
Gonzales, however, was the owner of an adult foster home, in which several other people had access to Gonzales’ IP address. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
That's why criminal cases have captions like State of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Gonzales was the lead plaintiff, and a lot of people and groups signed on. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Gonzales (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 35, review granted Feb. 17, 2016, S231171 [whether entering bank to cash forged checks is shoplifting]; People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:24 am by David Markus
I write separately to agree on record with Justice Thomas’s concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 am by JB
That is because Congress can regulate economic activities that have a cumulative economic effect on interstate commerce, and as Justice Scalia pointed out in Gonzales v. [read post]