Search for: "People v. Gonzales (1993)" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
I’ve recently heard some people argue that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 — which the Supreme Court applied in Hobby Lobby — violates the separation of powers. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The 2006 RFRA Decision Holding That a Small Religious Group Has Rights to Use an Untested and Illegal Drug In 2006, in its first and only RFRA decision on the merits to date, the Supreme Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Say that you feel a religious obligation to use a prohibited drug — hoasca (the drug at issue in Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 12:11 pm by Louise Melling
Her mark is in the jurisprudence, it’s on our protest posters, and it’s in our hearts.Writing in dissent in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
That should not have been a fully satisfactory response to the Establishment Clause objection, because it fails to answer the question of why the government can lift burdens it has created for people with religious scruples but not for people with other sorts of scruples. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:00 pm
Flores (1997), the Court unanimously held in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
RFRA and RLUIPA have been applied by the Supreme Court three times, once allowing a religious exemption along conservative-liberal lines (Hobby Lobby), and twice allowing it unanimously (Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
   That should not have been a fully satisfactory response to the Establishment Clause objection, because it fails to answer the question of why the government can lift burdens it has created for people with religious scruples but not for people with other sorts of scruples. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), General Electric Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am by O. Carter Snead
  In numerous past cases, the Court has recognized free exercise protections (including under RFRA) for non-profit business associations (e.g., Gonzales v. [read post]