Search for: "People v. Graham" Results 21 - 40 of 804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
But it would be a risky mistake to dismiss or ignore this latest gambit.Even so, we should not miss the elements of a head-spinning flip-flop that have accompanied this move.In May, following the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health opinion, Graham praised its embrace of states’ rights.As he put it at the time, “If the Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:41 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court today issued an historic ruling in Graham v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
”’” (Id. at p. 382, quoting Graham, supra, 560 U.S. at p. 69 and Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
Ms Grahame yesterday described the claims as “ridiculous”.Labour MSP Michael McMahon said: “Christine Grahame has a responsibility to ensure the Scottish Government is doing all it can to protect people from sectarianism and racism and any questions raised about her position on this matter must be cleared up as soon as possible. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
 In two places, he responds directly to arguments made by the dissent, saying things like:"Although the dissent cites Graham as mandating an individualized sentencing decision by the trial court, this requirement is in fact nowhere to be found in Graham. [read post]
31 May 2016, 8:36 pm by Jennifer Lynch
Graham—Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals En Banc opinion Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
Some conservatives say foreign practices are irrelevant to U.S. law.Undaunted, Justice Kennedy used his opinion in Monday's case, Graham v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
National Bank Assn.) and for the worst majority opinion (People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm by Youngjae Lee
It should also be pointed out that the categorical v. case-by-case debate is not some new thing that just occurred to people in 2009. [read post]