Search for: "People v. Green (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by James Eckert
A verdict is repugnant if an acquittal on one charge conclusively negates a necessary element of a crime for which the defendant was convicted (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm by Erin Miller
The following essay by Jamal Greene is part of our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens.   [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:54 am by Jon Sands
This instruction was required under the California Supreme Court's decision in People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:16 am by admin
For example, see Greene v Watts (1962) 210 CA2d 103 (young child may not be capable of assumption of risk or contributory negligence in dog-bite case) or the ruling in People v Berry (1991) 1 CA4th 778 (a child under the age five is not legally capable of acting with reasonable care towards a dog). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:20 pm by James Kachmar
The primary issue facing the Ninth Circuit in the case Fifty Six Hope Road, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
Wolf then says:For proof that "criminal justice reform" has led or contributed to the rise in crime, the article relies exclusively on the testimony of the above-mentioned Green, and Georgetown Law professor Bill Otis. [read post]