Search for: "People v. Green (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2007, 8:47 am
People sometimes figure out that I do some work in section 1983 litigation, and call me up wanting to sue over various Social Services departments, which they claim have violated their rights in connection with child custody matters.And, such was the claim before Judge Moon in Nelson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by Adam Wagner
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 imposes a blanket restriction on all convicted prisoners in detention irrespective of the length of their sentence and irrespective of the nature or gravity of their offence and their individual circumstances. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm by Law Lady
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Peoples First Community Bank Panama City, Florida, a.k.a. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Green (1980)—are aberrations and products of a no-longer popular legal school of thought. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Green (1980)—are aberrations and products of a no-longer popular legal school of thought. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm by Colin Murray
If that was the political calculation, then the circumstances surrounding it became much more complicated with the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Greens v United Kingdom at the end of last month. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
He tries to reassure those people that they `are not in trouble’ and that, even though medical treatment is expensive, their immediate health is more important than the cost. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite this ruling the UK government has not yet amended the offending provisions of s.3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]