Search for: "People v. Griffin"
Results 301 - 320
of 369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am
Scale it back, settle what was at issue; create new business models, but you can’t force people into them. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
There are, however, some cases dealing addressing important substantive issues, and few in which Courts seem ready to turn the ADA and FHA into laws to help people instead of laws to make lawyers rich. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
At least 69 people became ill. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
As noted in the commonly cited case Griffin v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Bobby Scott (D-Va.) in the Zubik v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:58 pm
Griffin, Jr. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I have known Mark Graber, Steve Griffin, Bill Galston, and Jennifer Hochschild for many years, and we have been talking (and arguing) about some of these issues since our earliest meeting. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a student in Tinker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
I like FPTP) – but bringing buffoons like Nick Griffin into the debate is just daft. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Street v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
(Bush, J., dissenting, joined by Siler and Griffin, JJ.). [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:38 am
Aeroquip Credit Union, 936 F.3d 489, 493 (6th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted); see also Griffin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
We are a country of immigrants & refugees, of people fleeing religious persecution & seeking freedom, a country made strong by diversity. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am
” Order at 5, Griffin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
