Search for: "People v. Griffin" Results 101 - 120 of 400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
No, the government can't require people who engage in speech with a specific sort of content (fact-checking) or who belong to a specific organization of writers (the International Fact-Checking Network) to register and provide a bond before speaking—just as the government can't require people who engage in speech with a specific sort of content to pay extra money for police protection (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004) Danie [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Leslie Griffin argues that yesterday’s two rulings, as well as the recent decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At Justia’s Verdict blog, Leslie Griffin weighs in on Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]