Search for: "People v. Griffith"
Results 81 - 100
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
Supreme Court, Judges Thomas Griffith, Brett Kavanaugh and Robert Wilkins of the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:34 am
Epic v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:07 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Kavanaugh (with Brown and Griffith) Judge Kavanaugh, joined by Judges Brown and Griffith, authored the principal concurrence. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It was largely thanks to the untiring efforts of people such as these that the far-sighted and patriotic Churchill could find himself described in late 1930s Britain as “unquestionably the biggest war-monger in the world today” and as a man of the ‘war psychosis’ (both quoted in Richard Griffiths&rsquo [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
In a pair of cases in the 1980s (Griffith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Mein v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 10:34 am
’ I get so damn tired of stupid people. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a petition for rehearing en banc in Sissel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
Griffiths & N.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:35 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Morgan Griffith (R-VA), and Rep. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Griffith, 971 So.2d at 232, 236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 13-0639, asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule conflicts with the retroactivity rule established in Griffith v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 pm
So, you should listen to Bill Ferrell and the team at Trademarkology—not only because they write on interesting things, but because if you don’t listen to people like Bill, you can end up in one of their posts. [read post]
