Search for: "People v. Groves" Results 41 - 60 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 6:49 am by Howard Wasserman
.* Although Ringhand and Collins don't say it in so many terms, the conclusion people are drawing is that hearings are substantive, meaningful, and beneficial, not the "vapid and hollow charade" that Professor Kagan decried in her sure-to-be-talked-about 1995 article. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:53 am by mdkeenan
In People v Hutt, the defendant refused to let medical personnel draw his blood and refused to provide a urine sample despite a warrant authorizing these samples. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
If a Court finds that 2 or more people are responsible for a motor vehicle collision in British Columbia the Court must ‘apportion’ liability as between them. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:19 am by kroosevelt
And William Hubbard presents the first empirical study of Erie’s effect on vertical forum shopping, using the Supreme Court decision in Shady Grove v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:21 pm by Robert Scott Lawrence
Despite the warning we received at birth, we all secretly know that people actually do tend to judge books by their covers. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by James Romoser
The justices return to the virtual bench for oral arguments, starting Monday at 10 a.m. with Pham v. [read post]