Search for: "People v. Grow (1978)"
Results 21 - 40
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2017, 11:20 am
Virginia, 219 Va. 560, 562, 248 S.E.2d 808 (1978). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Abbar was introduced to the hybrid desk, which was growing under Pandit’s predecessor, Charles “Chuck” Prince. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 2:05 pm
As established in the 1978 federal case of U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
To reach this aim, living standards of the people had to be raised and productive capacities developed. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
The case turns on the meaning of a 1978 federal law, the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
” State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
” State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:11 pm
However, a growing number of people are turning to loan sharks for extra cash. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
National Rifle Association v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
It will show that the growing global community concerned about mass surveillance can band together and get legislation passed. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Corky Gonzáles and his followers in Denver had developed the image of the Crusade for Justice as ‘the vanguard’ of the rapidly growing Chicano Power Movement. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
Corky Gonzáles and his followers in Denver had developed the image of the Crusade for Justice as ‘the vanguard’ of the rapidly growing Chicano Power Movement. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) (intentionally f [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
Barry, 438 U.S. 531, 541 (1978). [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:34 pm
Brumbaugh, 355 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1978); People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
People who may need to defend themselves in a sudden emergency need to practice with the gun they will actually use. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Germany of 6 September 1978, Malone v. the United Kingdom from August 2, 1984, etc.).58. interpretative value of the preamble is deeply rooted in countries with common law system ( common law ), Preamble to the Constitution embodying a guiding framework for constitutional interpretation.59. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
