Search for: "People v. Hale" Results 1 - 20 of 290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Indirect discrimination The policy did not put transgender people at a substantial disadvantage compared with cisgender people who were also subject to the policy [74]. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:45 am
  Maybe it's time to remove that HOA board and get people who understand that sometimes people get behind on dues. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
But, as far as I can see, Baroness Hale and Lord Neube [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm?”. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
I know that Baroness Hale in Stack made it quite clear that it is not the job of the court to search for the result which it considers to be fair, but isn't that the job of the law? [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:22 pm
They also lead people to spend far more on the legal battle and is warranted by the sums actually at stake. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
Lady Hale reviewed the authorities at domestic and CJEU level (the latter consisting of no fewer than 12 cases from Mangold v Helm [2006] 1 CML 1132 to and Case C-447/09 Prigge & Ors v Deutsche Lufthansa AG [2011] IRLR 1052). [read post]