Search for: "People v. Hale" Results 1 - 20 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Indirect discrimination The policy did not put transgender people at a substantial disadvantage compared with cisgender people who were also subject to the policy [74]. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:45 am
  Maybe it's time to remove that HOA board and get people who understand that sometimes people get behind on dues. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:34 am
  Maybe it's time to remove that HOA board and get people who understand that sometimes people get behind on dues. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Eric E. Johnson
TweetThe Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press has issued a news release about the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Too Much Media v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Not for the first time, I (and I suspect others) have been completely wrong-footed by Baroness Hale. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Discrimination The principle in Thlimennos v Greece requires unlike cases to be treated differently [40]. [read post]