Search for: "People v. Hale" Results 1 - 20 of 342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Indirect discrimination The policy did not put transgender people at a substantial disadvantage compared with cisgender people who were also subject to the policy [74]. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
But, as far as I can see, Baroness Hale and Lord Neube [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:42 am by Sam Glover
The US Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision Gideon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm?”. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
I know that Baroness Hale in Stack made it quite clear that it is not the job of the court to search for the result which it considers to be fair, but isn't that the job of the law? [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:22 pm
They also lead people to spend far more on the legal battle and is warranted by the sums actually at stake. [read post]