Search for: "People v. Han (2000)" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 4:00 am
But building on the 1890 case of Hans v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:59 pm by Simon Chester
The discussions of Ronald Dworkin at page 12, Herbert Hart at 36 and 219, Joseph Raz at 95 and Hans Kelsen at 95 are caricatures that verge on travesty. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Coleman Co., 2000 WL 1131893, at *2 (9th Cir. 2000) (in table at 232 F.3d 894). [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Aramark Foods; 2000 Jury Verdicts LEXIS 60403 Lucasfilm Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
For example, a federal appeals court ruled in White v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
His quest began when a legal historian, the late professor Hans W. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
Finally, parts five and six highlight remaining issues and conclude.. . . . .V. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Last year the law faculty at Penn State approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law".  [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution:  The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]