Search for: "People v. Hansard"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 2:37 pm
A couple more events to add shortly in Edinburgh, London and Estonia - I must be mad..Oh andGIKII V: the Voyage Home - Edinburgh, 28th-29th June. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Technology My Favourite Apps – Part V Lesha Van Der Bij Passwords. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:53 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
[4] Guerin v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:21 am
In this week’s case (Franzman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:12 pm
Here is an example: 1) On Google.ca, I type in "Dunsmur" and the first thing I get is “Dunsmuir v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
Judge Jarman QC found that s.35 was ambiguous and, hence, that he was entitled to have regard to the Hansard debates that surrounded s.35 and the subsequent amendments, applying Pepper v Hart [1993] A.C. 593, HL. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
You can read the Hansard here. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
"During the passage of the Representation of the People Act 2000, which enlarged the franchise to include remand prisoners and psychiatric inpatients (RPA 2000 ss2 and 4), Labour's Harry Barnes suggested that in seeking to "enfranchise people who are dependent on decisions made by elected representatives" (HC Hansard 15 December 1999 Col 293-4) consideration should be given to extending voting rights to all prisoners. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:04 pm
 A recent case (McEvoy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
The online Hansard archive contains how many words? [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:19 pm
It is unfortunate that it has taken so long for people to wake up to it. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
The founders of the United States understood that “an ignorant people cannot remain a free people and that democracy cannot survive too much ignorance. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In Allard v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:54 am
Reg. 4685 (Jan. 21, 2009). [6] See Burka v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
The Hansard report of the debate can be found here. [read post]
