Search for: "People v. Harper" Results 241 - 260 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Canada Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper applied to strike out a defamation claim brought by former Cabinet Minister, Helena Guergis in the Ontario Superior Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am by Michael Geist
Justice Ian Binnie, who wrote the Theberge majority, had retired from the court and two new Harper appointees, Justices Moldaver and Karakatsanis had just joined. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Guest Blogger
After the amendment’s ratification, Harper v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
[I]t is . . . the court's finding to have been very coordinated activity between and among the people who were part of this scheme that Diamreyan joined in. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Brent Lorentz
As some of you may have noticed, one my esteemed colleagues, Jonathan Applebaum, recently wrote an entertaining and informative post regarding Major League Baseball Player Bryce Harper’s efforts to trademark the phrase, “That’s a clown question, bro.”  This was just the most recent example of so called catch phrase trademarks where people have tried to harness the publicity of clever or witty public commentary in an effort to sell merchandise. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am by Steve Lombardi
The incident involved one vehicle and occurred on county highway M-54. 64-year-old Nola Jean Harper of Des Moines was heading ... [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
“That a group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:17 am by Steve Erickson
  First, it may be the case that Harper's penological interest standard is more accommodating to the government's interest than the medically appropriate standard offered in Riggins v. [read post]