Search for: "People v. Harper"
Results 241 - 260
of 364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
[I]t is . . . the court's finding to have been very coordinated activity between and among the people who were part of this scheme that Diamreyan joined in. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:33 am
Dundas v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:51 am
The case, Florida v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
” Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
As some of you may have noticed, one my esteemed colleagues, Jonathan Applebaum, recently wrote an entertaining and informative post regarding Major League Baseball Player Bryce Harper’s efforts to trademark the phrase, “That’s a clown question, bro.” This was just the most recent example of so called catch phrase trademarks where people have tried to harness the publicity of clever or witty public commentary in an effort to sell merchandise. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
The incident involved one vehicle and occurred on county highway M-54. 64-year-old Nola Jean Harper of Des Moines was heading ... [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
“That a group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:03 am
People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
[FN2] and Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
First, it may be the case that Harper's penological interest standard is more accommodating to the government's interest than the medically appropriate standard offered in Riggins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
The case is entitled Wang v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm
(See Harper’s excellent article on the history of the tax advantaged Google operation Keyword: Evil.) [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Nonetheless, in Harper v. [read post]